Arabic Language Ideology Shapes Policy, Says Scholar at GU-Q Talks
In a thought-provoking series of talks at Georgetown University in Qatar (GU-Q), Dr. Yasir Suleiman CBE, Emeritus Professor of Modern Arabic Studies at the University of Cambridge, addressed the way that Arabic language is taught and used for political purposes.
Rethinking Arabic Grammar Education
During a public event held in English, Dr. Suleiman first explored the politics of Arabic language education, particularly the traditional emphasis on form over meaning in teaching Arabic grammar, describing it as “a defining feature.”
“Arabic language ideology is characterized by an ethical stance, according to which, deviating from grammatical rules is tantamount to deviating from the truth,” said Dr. Suleiman, shedding light on the deep-seated beliefs that influence language teaching and policy.
Drawing from his expertise as a consultant on Qatar’s education reform initiative, Education for a New Era, Dr. Suleiman shared how these beliefs shape language policy. He advocated for a modern pedagogy that emphasizes practical application and contextual learning over rote memorization, insights that could inspire educational reforms and discussions across different regional frameworks.
Misinterpretation of Arabic for Political Aims
At a discussion in Arabic hosted by GU-Q’s Arabic Book Club, Dr. Suleiman continued to share his expertise, this time discussing how Arabic terms are misinterpreted for political aims. The event, moderated by GU-Q Associate Professor of Arabic Dr. Yehia Mohamed, included a panel discussion with professors Khaled Al Hroub, Northwestern Qatar, Muntasir Al Hamad, Qatar University, and Emad Abdullatif, Qatar University. They explored the themes of linguistic ideology and the deliberate misinterpretation of Arabic terms to fuel anti-Arab and Islamophobic sentiment in America, as discussed in Dr. Suleiman’s book, The Arabic Language in the Fray: A Study in Ideology, Anxiety and Terrorism.
Dr. Suleiman painted a vivid picture of “the racism faced by Arabic speakers in their new environment.” He argued that proponents of this bias manipulate the Arabic language “to justify animosity toward others and associate them with terrorism.”
